A new owner evicting the tenant and the eviction-for-need process
Rental Law

Can a New Owner Evict the Tenant? (2026 Legal Process)

June 24, 2026  ·  Mehmet Bulun
← Back to Blog

"I bought the place, I'll just evict the tenant now." Most buyers assume that the moment the title deed is in their hands, the property is essentially empty. Yet in Turkey a tenancy runs not on ownership but on the contract. When the title changes hands, the lease doesn't vanish; it passes onto the new owner's shoulders on exactly the same terms.

In this article I explain how things actually work when you buy a tenanted home, or when the home you live in is sold. I'll look at both sides: the buyer acquiring the property as an investment, and the tenant living inside. Because both ends of this equation answer to the same law, and the side that doesn't know that law always ends up weaker at the table.

First, let's break a myth: sale does not break the lease

Article 310 of the Turkish Code of Obligations is clear: if the leased property changes hands for any reason after the contract is concluded, the new owner becomes a party to the lease. Lawyers call this the "sale does not break the lease" principle. In other words, when you buy the property, you legally take over the lease the former owner signed with the tenant. The rent, the term, the conditions... they all continue unchanged.

This means that as the new owner you cannot raise the rent at will, shorten the lease term, or say "I'm the new owner, I make the rules." The law places you inside the existing contract, not outside it. The tenant, in turn, is under no obligation to sign a new contract or pay a new deposit in this process.

Observation: Some investors who buy a tenanted property with the comfort of "I'll just evict them anyway" realize months later that they are still inside the very same contract. The point that really matters is this: a tenanted property is not an empty property; what you bought is a contract along with the bricks.

So can the new owner never evict the tenant?

They can, but not without a reason. The law opens a special door for the new owner: eviction for need. Article 351 of the Turkish Code of Obligations grants a person who acquires the property later the right to evict the tenant if they have a genuine need for it for themselves or their close relatives.

Here "close relatives" means, as the law lists them: the owner's spouse, descendants (children, grandchildren), ascendants (parents) or persons they are legally obliged to support. The need may be for housing or for a workplace. For example, if you intend to live in the flat yourself, settle a child there, or provide housing for a dependent, you can resort to this route.

Note the distinction: this is not an "evict on demand" right, but an "evict once proven" right. You must establish before the court that you genuinely need the property.

Two legal routes and the deadlines you must not miss

Article 351 offers the new owner two separate routes. Which one you choose depends on when you acquired the property and whether you are in a hurry. In both, the deadlines are sharp; missing a single day can push your entire right to the next lease term.

ROUTE 1 — Acting right after acquisition

1
Within one month of the date you acquire the property (take the title deed), you send the tenant a written notice. This notice must clearly state your need for the property.
2
You may file the eviction lawsuit six months after the acquisition date. This six-month period runs from the acquisition date, not from the date the notice is delivered.

ROUTE 2 — Waiting for the existing lease to end

1
Without rushing, you wait for the term of the existing lease to expire.
2
You file your eviction lawsuit within one month of the date the lease ends. On this route you do not have to wait six months.
Observation: On the first route, the most common mistake is to let the one-month notice window slip by quietly. An owner who fails to send the notice in time loses the fast route entirely and has to wait for the lease to end. Here, deadlines matter more than good intentions.

What does "genuine, sincere and compulsory need" really mean?

This is the phrase that decides the fate of eviction lawsuits. The court examines whether the need you assert is genuine, sincere and compulsory. In other words, it looks for a need that actually exists, not one staged for show.

If the claim of need is in fact a pretext to evict the tenant and re-let at a higher price, or to sell the property at once, the court will see it and dismiss the case. For instance, saying "my son will live here" and then renting the home to someone else after the tenant leaves is the classic example of an insincere need; it both weakens your case and triggers the compensation risk I describe below.

So when pursuing eviction for need, you must build a concrete picture that supports your intention: a real housing need to be occupied, a workplace to be opened, a family situation requiring the move. Vague, "I might need it later" type reasons do not hold up in court.

After eviction: the three-year re-letting ban

Say you won the case on the grounds of need and the tenant moved out. It doesn't end there. Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations bans re-letting a property vacated for need to anyone other than the former tenant for three years, absent just cause.

If you breach this ban the consequence is heavy: the former tenant can sue you for compensation, and the amount you pay cannot be less than one year's rent from the final lease year. In other words, if you evict a home claiming "I need it" and then quickly rent it to someone else, the bill for the case you thought you had won comes back to you.

Observation: This is exactly the point missed by those who buy a tenanted home as an investment and plan to re-let it quickly at a higher price. The three-year ban is the strongest barrier in the path of anyone trying to turn the need route into a rent-grab tool.

From an investor's eye: is buying tenanted property an advantage or a risk?

I'm often asked: "Should I buy the tenanted flat or the empty one?" The answer depends on your intention. If you'll hold the property for rental income, having a reliable, paying tenant inside is an advantage; your cash flow starts from day one and you avoid the hassle of re-letting. Tenanted properties also often change hands at a slightly more favorable price than their vacant equivalents.

But if you intend to live in the property yourself or want vacant possession in the short term, a tenanted home loads you with time and process costs. In that case, before buying you need to see the lease, its end date and the tenant's profile, and to calculate from the outset how long the eviction route will take. The negotiation, too, must be built on this reality.

The point that really matters is this: when evaluating a tenanted property, looking only at the price per square meter is not enough. The current rent, the state of the contract and the potential eviction process directly affect the true value of that property. Looked at with the right questions, a tenanted flat can be an opportunity; bought without asking them, it becomes an unexpected waiting period.

What should you do if you are the tenant?

If the home you live in has been sold, there's no need to panic. Your lease continues unchanged; the new owner cannot evict you overnight or raise your rent at will. For the new owner to require you to vacate, they must either prove a genuine need or rely on the other limited grounds set out in the law.

If you receive a notice, look carefully at its date and content, and note the deadlines. Knowing your rights keeps the process from catching you defenceless. When in doubt, the healthiest course is to consult a specialist before taking any step.

Summary: Sale does not break the lease. A new owner can only evict the tenant for a genuine need, with the right timing and procedure; and after eviction cannot re-let to anyone else for three years. The side that knows these three sentences, whether buyer or tenant, stands in the right place at the table.

If you're considering buying a tenanted property, or you're a tenant in a sold home wanting to clarify where you stand, would you like to assess your situation together? A well-structured approach protects you right from the start.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a lease end when the property is sold?
No. Under the "sale does not break the lease" principle in Article 310 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, the lease continues even when the property changes hands. The new owner becomes a party to the existing lease as a statutory successor and takes over the previous owner's rights and obligations.
Can a new owner evict the tenant immediately?
No. A new owner cannot evict the tenant simply by saying "I bought the property." Eviction is only possible on the basis of a genuine, sincere and compulsory housing or workplace need, through an eviction lawsuit filed with the correct timing and procedure.
When can the new owner file an eviction lawsuit for need?
Article 351 offers two routes. In the first, the new owner notifies the tenant in writing within one month of acquiring the property and may file the lawsuit six months after the acquisition date. In the second, they wait for the existing lease term to end and file within one month of that end date.
Can a new owner raise the rent or shorten the lease term?
No. The new owner becomes a party to the existing lease as it stands; they cannot unilaterally raise the rent or shorten the term. Rent increases still apply within the legal limits and the contract terms.
What happens if the property is re-let to someone else within three years after eviction for need?
Under Article 355, a property vacated for need cannot be re-let to anyone other than the former tenant for three years without just cause. Breaching this ban requires paying the former tenant compensation of no less than one year's rent from the final lease year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a lease end when the property is sold?
No. Under the 'sale does not break the lease' principle in Article 310 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, the lease continues even when the property changes hands. The new owner becomes a party to the existing lease as a statutory successor and takes over the previous owner's rights and obligations.
Can a new owner evict the tenant immediately?
No. A new owner cannot evict the tenant simply by saying 'I bought the property.' Eviction is only possible on the basis of a genuine, sincere and compulsory housing or workplace need, through an eviction lawsuit filed with the correct timing and procedure.
When can the new owner file an eviction lawsuit for need?
Article 351 offers two routes. In the first, the new owner notifies the tenant in writing within one month of acquiring the property and may file the lawsuit six months after the acquisition date. In the second, they wait for the existing lease term to end and file within one month of that end date.
Can a new owner raise the rent or shorten the lease term?
No. The new owner becomes a party to the existing lease as it stands; they cannot unilaterally raise the rent or shorten the term. Rent increases still apply within the legal limits and the contract terms.
What happens if the property is re-let to someone else within three years after eviction for need?
Under Article 355, a property vacated for need cannot be re-let to anyone other than the former tenant for three years without just cause. Breaching this ban requires paying the former tenant compensation of no less than one year's rent from the final lease year.